Bush/Cheney Pot calling the Kettle black!
Thu May 29, 2008 at 06:01:48 AM PDT
Anniversary of ’05 Uzbek Uprising
The Bush/Cheney Neocons would have loved patterning the USA after the repressive government of Uzbekistan but thanks to our constitution (although, a bit tattered from the last 8 years) for not allowing them this fantasy. With all their criminal efforts they have rendered America as the Pot and Uzbekistan the Kettle. The charred blackness which is on the Pot; doesn't see the black on himself and calls the kettle black!
thinkingblue.blogspot.com
Engaging the world: An Educational Proposal from "Lions for Lambs"
Sat Apr 19, 2008 at 09:56:46 AM PDT
I have been urging more Mandarin and study abroad programs in Oregon's public schools and universities since the summer of 2006. This is part of that effort. It was originally posted on BlueOregonhere.
The movie "Lions for Lamb" (seehere) directed by Robert Redford and starring Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Cruise, is just out on DVD. It’s a political thriller about the war in Afghanistan, but the dialogues raise many issues. Rent it, see it.
In the middle of the movie there is a scene which slips in a profound proposal for US education. Because I am now developing similar legislation, several component proposals for a high school study abroad program, I found the scene riveting. Let us in Oregon take the movie proposal seriously. Let us not mandate it, nor limit it to the Junior year, as in the movie, but let us see what parts we could make as options for our students.
Chain(s) of slavery.
Tue Sep 25, 2007 at 11:10:16 AM PDT
A continuation on the topic of shopping, consumerism and the environment covered in She's dead! Wrapped in Plastic! and Planned obsolescence.
A lot of us are beginning to question the unholy gods of capitalism and globalization. Many of us can see where it is getting us environmentally and safetywise.
Lately, the recalls from china have been numerous; the things being recalled are dangerous or deadly to our children and our pets.
But in addition to the environmental toll and the risk to our safety, there is often a toll on humanity.
Bushists Act As Uniters Not Dividers of US Military Rivals
Wed Aug 08, 2007 at 11:52:59 AM PDT
Bush-Cheney Policies Help Revive Russo-Chinese Military Alliance
The implementation of Bush-Cheney Foreign Policy, 2001-2007, has succeeded in reviving strategic and tactical Russian-Chinese military ties for the first time since the Russo-Chinese Military Alliance split apart over three decades ago. US Foreign Policy from Nixon-Kissinger on tried to help make this split permanent, and to cultivate separate relationships between the US and China, and the US and Russia, on two separate tracks.
Now, thanks largely to Bush’s "Bring ‘em all on" approach to world diplomacy, and to the inept, misguided, and badly informed Bush-Cheney operators in the State Dept. (John Bolton & Co.), this military alliance has been revived. Through a series of strategic and tactical blunders, Bush-Cheney policies have helped revive a long-past Russo-Chinese alliance, now known as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which certainly is potentially not good news for the United States, in the short or the long term.
In fact, many analysts regard the new SCO Organization as a potential global challenge to NATO, which is now at least nominally in charge of our own military operations in Afghanistan.
DEMS SING `OUR HOUSE IS A VERY, VERY, VERY BLUE HOUSE'
Wed Nov 08, 2006 at 06:24:02 AM PDT
I'll end the quagmire
You put the cowards in their place
With subpoenas, today
Staring at the liars
For hours and hours
While they spin their myths
Or plead their Fifths ...
Suddenly we're free
We're free
Succumb to us now
Suppress your lies for just five minutes
Everything is good ...
No more gloom and doom
The truth is now illuminated
By the sunshine hearings
Fiery Dems come through,
GOP adieuuuuuuuuu ...
The Aral Sea and the Fate of the World
Wed Oct 04, 2006 at 05:03:17 PM PDT
Sometimes I get asked, "Why don't you have kids? How come you don't want to have kids?" It's a very simple answer, really. I don't want to be responsible for bringing someone into what is sure to be a profoundly shitty world in the future. And, lets say I have a kid when I'm 40 in 2010. My son has a kid when he is 40 in 2050.
This is what my grandchild will have to look forward to -
Drought threatening the lives of millions will spread across half the land surface of the Earth in the coming century because of global warming, according to new predictions from Britain's leading climate scientists.
"This is genuinely terrifying," said Andrew Pendleton of Christian Aid. "It is a death sentence for many millions of people. It will mean migration off the land at levels we have not seen before, and at levels poor countries cannot cope with."
This scenario has already played out in an advanced economy -
Aralsk Harbor, Kazakhstan
Juan Cole on "Why Torture?"
Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 11:06:23 AM PDT
Informed Comment today has a
great take on the Bush adminstration's motives for doing torture, especially in Iraq. Bottom line:
torture is useful because it produces bad intelligence -- which is the goal!
Extended excerpts below the fold.
Say No to Thugs
Wed Aug 30, 2006 at 06:21:14 PM PDT
What's more important: massacres or airbases?
In case anybody has forgotten who our allies in the war on terror are, here's a friendly reminder.
Moral of the story: freedom can't march when it's shot by U.S.-backed dictators.
To the -stan countries!
UK Foreign Office threaten former Ambassador Murray over book on rendition and torture in Uzbekistan
Mon Feb 13, 2006 at 12:41:31 PM PDT
Britain's outspoken former Ambassador to the Central Asian Republic of Uzbekistan, Craig Murray who helped expose vicious human rights abuses by the US-funded regime of Islam Karimov is now engaged in a battle with The British Foreign and Commonwealth Office who are determined to stop him from publishing his book,
Murder in Samarkand.
The British Government has come out with fully armed and are threatening four grounds of legal action if he goes to press:
a) Libel
b) Crown Copyright
c) Breach of Confidence
d) Official Secrets Act
But he doesn't care, he’s going to press anyway.
It's possible I have been wiretapped
Sat Jan 28, 2006 at 07:35:22 PM PDT
I'm serious. Last summer we agreed to host an exchange student from Uzbekistan, and she calls home every few weeks. (She's a fabulous kid--smart, energetic, and curious.)
I've followed this unauthorized wiretapping story closely, and I think that we meet the criteria: calls between the USA and a foreign country known to be friendly to terrorists. (Okay, I know that's just what they claim to be the criteria, but we do fall into that category.)
I also know that she's in touch with several people in the USA (Peace Corps workers and Doctors Without Borders alum) who have connections to Uzbekistan. Is it possible that our internet communications have been monitored?
Does anyone at DKos know how to find out if you've been the subject of surveillance?
The Poetry of Dick Cheney [UPDATE]
Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 11:14:46 AM PDT
For the safety and security of the person(s) involved, I cannot reveal how these authenticated pages of
The Poetry of Dick Cheney came into my possession.
These poems were scribbled in the pages of a handsome, leather-bound, oiled Moleskine Journal.
I am reproducing some of the poems here to offer insight into the mind of the man who many call "The Dark Lord." Please leave your reactions and comments, below.
Thank you.
Read on for Dick Cheney's poems...
Uzbeksistan Has More than Torture to Worry About
Tue Jan 24, 2006 at 09:34:52 AM PDT
From the
RFE/RL today:
Dozens of women recently took to the freezing streets in eastern Uzbekistan in the first public demonstration in Andijon since security forces fired on protesters eight months ago. In May, Andijon's residents and the international community were shocked when authorities used automatic weapons to disperse the crowd. Like in May, desperate residents are facing crushing social and economic hardship. But this time, protesters were seeking nothing more than regular gas and electricity supplies. And fear of official reprisal kept their demonstrations limited -- and exclusively female.
This story is actually a couple of days old, but goes to illustrate just how bad things are in Central Asia.
Craig Murray, torture memos and the US-Uzbek connection on Democracy Now
Fri Jan 20, 2006 at 09:56:54 PM PDT
Check out the
January 19th episode of Democracy Now. It features an hour-long interview with Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, fired after he protested complicity with Uzbekistan torturers (diaried
here by kos). He's eloquent, outlining (for example) the "fabric of deceipt" that launders bogus evidence from torture chambers, allowing the likes of Condi Rice and Tony Blair to quote it with perfect deniability.
See below the fold for more revelations from Murray (warning: some are horrific).
Bin Laden Calls Bush Bluff
Thu Jan 19, 2006 at 04:48:47 PM PDT
Bin Laden wants a truce. Bush says no. To me, Bin Laden just showed the world why we are really in Iraq.
Ours is a brand-new world of allatonceness - The Murray Torture Telegrams
Sat Dec 31, 2005 at 07:10:31 AM PDT
The Murray Torture Telegrams
Chris Floyd
By now, the world -- or at least the blogosphere -- has seen the documents released by former UK diplomat Craig Murray, proving that the Bush and Blair governments both knew that the "intelligence" they were receiving from Uzbekistan was the result of gruesome and agonizing tortures on thousands of innocent people. Bush and Blair knew this -- yet Bush continued to "render" his Terror War captives to Uzbekistan, and shower the nation's Stalinist dictator, Karimov, with gold, guns and public honor. And despite Blair's repeated and strenuous denials of any complicity in America's heinous practice of "rendition" (indeed, in one recent Parliamentary appearance, Blair pretended that he didn't even understand what the term meant), Murray's documents prove that Britain's leadership knew full well what was happening in Karimov's torture chambers. Yet, like their American counterparts, British officials not only condoned the Uzbek tortures, they also spent considerable energy in devising contorted -- and specious -- "justifications" for using the tainted fruits of these evil practices.
U.S. Outsources People-Boiling
Fri Dec 30, 2005 at 06:10:32 PM PDT
New Email message from UK ex-Ambassador Craig Murray
Fri Dec 30, 2005 at 06:02:44 PM PDT
A message from Craig Murray:
"Can I pass on my thanks to everyone who is posting the documents and making them public. You are striking a real blow for humanity and against the appalling decline in our civil liberties and standards.
We have also proved that, as long as we have good people out there, technology now makes it impossible for Western governments and political establishments to bury the truth, no matter how much they control the mainstream media." And he attaches another document, this time one that is already in the public domain, but seems pertinant to what so many of us are posting.
It is not secret, and not new, but gives a valuable historical context to the relationship between Uzbekistan and the West..
Torturing children
Fri Dec 30, 2005 at 10:37:32 AM PDT
The Murray
Torture Memos include this snippet:
At the Khuderbegainov trial I met an old man from Andizhan. Two of his children had been tortured in front of him until he signed a confession on the family's links with Bin Laden. Tears were streaming down his face. I have no doubt they had as much connection with Bin Laden as I do. This is the standard of the Uzbek intelligence services.
Greg Saunders comments:
To the fools out there who routinely praise the President for having the "moral clarity" to call terrorists evil, how can you reconcile that with the chummy relationship he's made with tyrants? The lesser of two evils argument doesn't really work when you chide anyone whose view of fighting terrorism is more nuanced than "smoke them out of their holes" and you verbally fellate the President for being "right on the only issue that matters". You're either in favor of moral relativism or you're not.
What's particularly hilarious is that the administration's apologists are turning a blind eye to one of the world's last stalinist regimes. They are cavorting with a brutal communist tyrant.
So who are the commie sympathizers? Who is supporting a tyrannical regime that runs rape and torture rooms, which routinely boils people alive and tortures children? Who is backing a country that regularly kills large numbers of its people?
It ain't liberals, that's for sure.